WELCOME BONUS 300%
UP TO €2000 + 100
FREE SPINS
UP TO €2000 + 100
FREE SPINS
Home → Games
Casino games at Arctic Casino
Video Poker: check payout table before betting
Full Pay Deuces Wild offers a 100.76% RTP with a negative house edge of −0.76%, making it the only mass game with positive expected value for players using optimal strategy. This mathematical advantage requires all four deuces to act as wild cards, creating unique winning combinations that exceed standard video poker payouts significantly during long-term play sessions.
Not So Ugly Ducks provides a 99.73% RTP with a 0.27% house edge, offering a more accessible variant for those avoiding complex strategy charts. The reduced payout for Five of a Kind drops from 200 to 16 units, while Four of a Kind falls to 4, altering volatility patterns compared to the full pay version in Illinois Deuces which sits at 98.91%.
Jacks or Better 8/5 tables deliver a 97.29% RTP with a 2.71% house edge, showing how reducing Full House and Flush payouts by two units costs 2.25 percentage points in return. Shorter tables like 9/5 yield 98.45% RTP, while 7/5 drops to 96.15%, proving that even minor payout adjustments drastically impact long-term player returns on mobile devices.
Dozen 2:1 Hits 12 of 37 Numbers
The American Roulette Five Number Bet covers sectors 0, 00, 1, 2, and 3, paying 6:1 but carrying a severe 7.89% house edge that exceeds the standard 5.26% edge found elsewhere on the wheel. This specific wager represents the worst possible bet available at any American roulette table, costing players significantly more per spin than single-number or column bets due to its inflated risk profile.
European Roulette lacks this specific five-sector trap, forcing players to rely on standard dozens or columns that carry lower edges closer to the baseline 2.7%. Avoiding the American variant protects bankrolls from the additional double-zero disadvantage, ensuring that every spin maintains a predictable statistical outcome without the punitive penalty applied to the five-number combination.
Mobile users often encounter American wheels in mixed lobbies, so verifying the wheel type before placing bets prevents accidental exposure to the highest house edge in casino games. Understanding that the Five Number Bet pays 6:1 despite covering only five numbers reveals the mathematical trap hiding behind seemingly generous odds for novice players seeking quick entertainment.
Craps: Pass Line plus Odds lowers the average
Craps Free Odds attached to a Pass Line bet offer a true 100.00% RTP with zero house edge, effectively neutralizing the 1.41% edge of the initial Pass Line wager. By taking 3-4-5x odds, the combined house edge drops to just 0.37%, making this the most mathematically favorable way to play craps on mobile platforms where roll speed is accelerated.
The odds portion pays according to real probabilities, rewarding Point 4 or 10 wins at 2:1, Points 5 or 9 at 3:2, and Points 6 or 8 at 6:5. This structure ensures that the casino retains no advantage on the odds money itself, allowing skilled players to minimize losses over thousands of rolls compared to flat-betting strategies that ignore the free odds opportunity.
Combining Pass Line with maximum allowed odds reduces the overall house advantage from 1.41% down to 0.37%, a significant improvement over other table games like Baccarat Player bets at 1.24%. Mobile apps often limit odds multipliers, so checking the specific rules before playing ensures players can access the lowest possible edge available in live dealer or RNG craps environments.
Baccarat commission: 5 percent on each Banker win
Baccarat Banker bets carry a 1.06% house edge despite paying only 0.95:1 due to a 5% commission charged on every winning hand. This commission structure compensates for the slight statistical advantage the Banker position holds over the Player, resulting in an RTP of 98.94% which remains superior to the Player bet's 98.76% return.
The Player bet offers a pure 1:1 payout with no commission, maintaining a 1.24% house edge and an RTP of 98.76% across eight-deck shoes. While simpler to calculate, the absence of commission does not offset the slightly higher house advantage compared to the Banker option, making the latter the statistically preferred choice for long-term bankroll preservation on mobile devices.
Tie bets paying 8:1 result in a disastrous 14.36% house edge and 85.64% RTP, representing the worst value in the entire baccarat suite. Even enhanced 9:1 tie payouts fail to improve the situation significantly, retaining a 4.84% edge that dwarfs the main bets, so mobile players should strictly avoid side wagers that promise high rewards for low probability outcomes.
Split, Double, and Surrender: Three Decisions Explained
Blackjack variants featuring Dealer Hits Soft 17 increase the house edge by 0.22 percentage points compared to standing rules, directly reducing the overall RTP from optimal levels. This rule change forces players to take more risks on soft totals, altering basic strategy charts and increasing the frequency of busts during high-stakes sessions on mobile interfaces.
Resplitting Aces improves player returns by 0.08 percentage points, while allowing Double After Split enhances them by another 0.14 percentage points relative to restrictive rules. These modifications compound to create a more favorable environment for advanced players, provided the base game uses three-to-two payouts rather than the punitive six-to-five structure found in many modern tables.
Surrender options further reduce the house edge, though their availability varies widely across different blackjack implementations found on online casino platforms. Combining favorable rules like DAS and RSA with early surrender can push the house edge below 0.50%, offering some of the best odds available in digital gaming formats for disciplined strategists.
Game categories at a glance
| Category | Examples | Stakes From | Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slots | Immortal Romance, Buffalo Power: Hold and Win, Money Train 4 | 0,10 EUR | thousands of titles |
| Table games | Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat | 0,50 EUR | classic rules |
| Live casino | Mega Fire Blaze Roulette Live, Ultimate Roulette | 0,20 EUR | real dealers |
| Jackpot games | Mega Moolah, Divine Fortune, Age of the Gods | 0,20 EUR | progressive pools |
| Instant games | Aviator, Plinko, Mines | 0,10 EUR | fast rounds |
| Video poker | Jacks or Better, Deuces Wild | 0,25 EUR | strategy based |
Plein Pays 35:1, Cheval Pays 17:1
The American Roulette Five Number Bet covers sectors zero, double zero, one, two, and three with a payout of 6:1. This wager yields an RTP of 92.11% and carries a house edge of 7.89%, which exceeds the standard 5.26% margin found on other bets. Players face significantly higher losses per spin compared to standard outside wagers that offer better return percentages.
Standard straight-up bets on a single number pay 35:1, creating a theoretical return of 94.74% for European wheels. The Cheval split bet pays 17:1, covering two adjacent numbers with identical mathematical expectations as the single-number wager. These payouts define the baseline risk profile for high-variance players seeking large multipliers on their initial stake amounts.
Comparing the 6:1 payout of the Five Number Bet against the 35:1 straight-up payoff reveals the severe impact of coverage area on house advantage. The specific combination of zero, double zero, one, two, and three creates the worst value proposition in the entire roulette ecosystem. Mobile users should avoid this trap entirely due to its disproportionate drain on bankroll efficiency over extended playing sessions.
Split 17:1 and Corner 8:1 in Payout Comparison
A Split wager covers two adjacent numbers and pays 17:1, maintaining the same 94.74% RTP as the straight-up bet on European wheels. This mid-range risk option allows players to hedge their exposure by targeting multiple outcomes with a single chip placement on the digital table grid. The payout structure remains consistent regardless of whether the player uses a desktop browser or a mobile device interface.
Corner bets cover four numbers arranged in a square and pay 8:1, also preserving the 94.74% theoretical return percentage for the casino operator. This configuration increases the hit frequency slightly compared to the Split bet while reducing the potential payout multiplier proportionally to the increased coverage. Players must calculate the expected value carefully before committing funds to these interior section wagers on the layout.
The difference between the 17:1 Split payout and the 8:1 Corner payout illustrates the linear relationship between coverage width and reward magnitude in roulette mathematics. Both options share the identical underlying house edge of approximately five percent, making them statistically equivalent in long-term performance metrics. Strategic selection depends entirely on the player's volatility preference rather than any inherent mathematical advantage within the game rules.
37 vs. 38 Sectors: One Zero Difference
European Roulette features thirty-seven sectors including a single zero, resulting in a house edge of 2.70% for even-money bets. American Roulette expands this wheel to thirty-eight sectors by adding a double zero, which directly increases the house advantage to 5.26% on standard wagers. This additional sector fundamentally alters the probability distribution for every possible outcome generated by the random number generator during play.
The presence of the double zero in the American variant reduces the RTP for basic outside bets from 97.30% down to 94.74% precisely. This degradation occurs because the winning probability for red, black, odd, or even outcomes drops from eighteen out of thirty-seven spins to eighteen out of thirty-eight. Mobile players switching between regional versions must account for this significant mathematical disadvantage when managing their session budgets effectively.
Side bets like the Baccarat Player Pair exhibit even steeper edges at 10.36% due to their specific payout structures and low probability triggers. While roulette edges remain relatively stable across different bet types, card game side bets often carry much higher margins that erode player equity rapidly. Understanding these structural differences helps analysts evaluate the true cost of entertainment across different casino game categories accurately.
Columns and Dozens Pay 2:1 in Roulette
Column bets cover twelve numbers arranged vertically on the layout and pay 2:1, offering a theoretical return of 97.30% on European wheels. This structure provides a balanced risk-reward profile for players who prefer covering one-third of the available numbers with each spin decision. The payout ratio ensures that winners recover their original stake plus an equal amount, maintaining positive expectancy relative to the house margin.
Dozen bets cover three groups of twelve numbers each, running from one to thirty-six, and also pay 2:1 with identical mathematical properties. These horizontal groupings allow for flexible betting strategies where multiple dozens can be covered simultaneously to increase hit frequency on the digital interface. The consistency in payout ratios simplifies bankroll management calculations for users tracking their performance over hundreds of rounds.
Comparing these 2:1 payouts to the 6:1 Five Number Bet highlights the severe penalty for concentrating wagers on fewer numbers with inflated multipliers. The column and dozen options maintain a house edge of only 2.70%, whereas the five-number trap imposes a 7.89% disadvantage on the player. Smart mobile gamblers prioritize these broader coverage bets to maximize their expected value and minimize variance during extended gaming sessions.
Multihand Blackjack with Up to 5 Hands
Blackjack using six decks with soft seventeen standing rules offers a base house edge of 0.46% when perfect basic strategy is applied consistently. The allowance for doubling after splitting and resplitting aces further optimizes the return, pushing the RTP to 99.54% under ideal conditions. Multihand gameplay allows players to execute these strategies across up to five separate hands simultaneously, increasing total action volume per hour significantly.
Switching to a six-deck shoe with dealer hitting on soft seventeen increases the house edge by 0.22 percentage points, raising it to 0.68%. This rule change negates some of the benefits provided by doubling after splits, which normally improves the player position by 0.14 percentage points. Analyzing these modifier effects helps determine the true cost of playing multihand variants on mobile devices versus traditional single-hand formats.
Using a single deck with classic rules and 3:2 payouts lowers the house edge to 0.15%, providing superior value compared to the six-deck version. However, many casinos compensate for this advantage by offering 6:5 payouts instead, which adds 1.39 percentage points to the house edge immediately. Players must verify the specific rule set of each multihand table to ensure they are not inadvertently accepting a significantly worse mathematical expectation.
Table Games Often Count Only 10 Percent
Tischspiele contribute only 10 percent toward the bonus turnover requirement, whereas Slots count for 100 percent of the wagering obligation. This disparity means that a player depositing 100 Euros and claiming the 300% match receives a 300 Euro bonus requiring 4,000 Euros in total turnover. Consequently, playing Baccarat or Roulette to clear this bonus is mathematically inefficient compared to utilizing high-contributing slot games for the same objective.
The 5% commission on Banker wins in Baccarat reduces the effective payout to 0.95:1, resulting in a house edge of 1.06%. Because table games contribute merely 10 percent to the wagering, every 10 Euros wagered on this side counts as only 1 Euro toward the 4,000 Euro target. Players must therefore wager significantly larger nominal amounts on these low-contribution games to satisfy the bonus terms effectively.
Straight, Split, and Corner in direct comparison
The American Roulette Five Number Bet covers five sectors (0, 00, 1, 2, 3) with a payout of 6:1, yielding an RTP of 92.11%. This specific wager carries a house edge of 7.89%, which is substantially higher than the standard 5.26% found on other American Roulette bets. It remains the only bet on the wheel with an edge exceeding 5.26 percent, making it statistically inferior to European variants for mobile players seeking value.
Game Shows: sectors, multipliers, and bet ranges
Video Poker Deuces Wild Full Pay offers a theoretical return to player rate of 100.76%, providing a negative house edge of -0.76 percent. This unique machine allows four Twos to act as wild cards, enabling payouts up to 800 for a Natural Royal Flush. Mobile users employing optimal strategy can achieve positive expected value, though any deviation immediately drops the RTP below the break-even threshold.
Before Double Down: read the open dealer card
Blackjack rules allowing Dealer Stands on Soft 17, Double After Split, and Double on Any Two cards yield a house edge of 0.46 percent. This configuration supports an RTP of 99.54 percent when players adhere strictly to basic strategy throughout their mobile sessions. The combination of favorable doubling and standing rules significantly reduces the casino advantage compared to tables where the dealer hits soft seventeen.
Three Roulette Variants, Three House Edges Compared
Craps Free Odds bets carry a zero house edge, paying according to true odds after a point is established on the Pass Line. When combined with a Pass Line bet using 3-4-5x odds, the overall game RTP reaches 99.63 percent, offering the lowest possible house advantage. Mobile players maximizing these odds minimize long-term losses more effectively than any other single table game available in the portfolio.
Contact
Live - online chat
Banking
Providers
Arctic Casino 2026